 
                                                                Alphabet’s Google announced plans to appeal the “adverse” portion of a recent court ruling that found the company illegally maintained monopoly power in certain areas of the online advertising market. The decision, handed down Thursday by U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, marks a significant development in the U.S. Department of Justice’s ongoing legal battle with the tech giant.
According to Reuters, Judge Brinkema determined that Google “willfully acquired and maintained monopoly power” in the digital advertising sector, particularly in markets for publisher ad servers and ad exchanges. These platforms are central to how online advertisements are placed and sold, and the ruling affirms the DOJ’s stance that Google has used its dominance in these areas to suppress competition.
The court’s decision was not entirely in favor of the DOJ, however. Per Reuters, Google emphasized that the ruling was mixed. The judge found that the company’s advertiser tools and its acquisitions of DoubleClick and AdMeld were not shown to be anticompetitive. However, the court sided with the DOJ in determining that Google’s conduct related to its publisher tools violated antitrust laws by shutting out competitors.
Related: Federal Judge Rules Google Illegally Monopolized Key Online Advertising Markets
As part of the DOJ’s case, the government argued that Google’s dominance necessitated structural remedies, including the divestiture of Google Ad Manager—a suite that encompasses the company’s publisher ad server and ad exchange. While the judge’s ruling did not immediately mandate such action, it opened the door to potential remedies aimed at curbing Google’s influence in the ad tech ecosystem.
Google said on Friday that it will seek to overturn the unfavorable aspects of the ruling through an appeal process, reinforcing its position that its ad tech practices support rather than hinder competition. The appeal will likely set the stage for further legal scrutiny and could reshape the regulatory landscape for digital advertising in the United States.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
                Meta Lawyers Try to Undercut Instagram Co-Founder’s Damaging Testimony
                Apr 23, 2025 by
                    CPI                
            
                Tyson Foods, Others Settle Pork Price-Fixing Suit for $64 Million
                Apr 23, 2025 by
                    CPI                
            
                NJ Sues RealPage, Landlords Over Rent Collusion
                Apr 23, 2025 by
                    CPI                
            
                DOJ Probes Disney’s FuboTV Acquisition Over Antitrust Concerns
                Apr 23, 2025 by
                    CPI                
            
                Former LG New Zealand Executives Plead Guilty Over Deleted Messages
                Apr 23, 2025 by
                    CPI                
            
Antitrust Mix by CPI
                Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
                Apr 21, 2025 by
                    CPI                
            
                Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
                Apr 21, 2025 by
                    John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya                
            
                Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
                Apr 21, 2025 by
                    Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson                
            
                AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
                Apr 21, 2025 by
                    Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili                
            
                Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
                Apr 21, 2025 by
                    Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece