
Alphabet’s Google announced plans to appeal the “adverse” portion of a recent court ruling that found the company illegally maintained monopoly power in certain areas of the online advertising market. The decision, handed down Thursday by U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, marks a significant development in the U.S. Department of Justice’s ongoing legal battle with the tech giant.
According to Reuters, Judge Brinkema determined that Google “willfully acquired and maintained monopoly power” in the digital advertising sector, particularly in markets for publisher ad servers and ad exchanges. These platforms are central to how online advertisements are placed and sold, and the ruling affirms the DOJ’s stance that Google has used its dominance in these areas to suppress competition.
The court’s decision was not entirely in favor of the DOJ, however. Per Reuters, Google emphasized that the ruling was mixed. The judge found that the company’s advertiser tools and its acquisitions of DoubleClick and AdMeld were not shown to be anticompetitive. However, the court sided with the DOJ in determining that Google’s conduct related to its publisher tools violated antitrust laws by shutting out competitors.
Related: Federal Judge Rules Google Illegally Monopolized Key Online Advertising Markets
As part of the DOJ’s case, the government argued that Google’s dominance necessitated structural remedies, including the divestiture of Google Ad Manager—a suite that encompasses the company’s publisher ad server and ad exchange. While the judge’s ruling did not immediately mandate such action, it opened the door to potential remedies aimed at curbing Google’s influence in the ad tech ecosystem.
Google said on Friday that it will seek to overturn the unfavorable aspects of the ruling through an appeal process, reinforcing its position that its ad tech practices support rather than hinder competition. The appeal will likely set the stage for further legal scrutiny and could reshape the regulatory landscape for digital advertising in the United States.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Meta Lawyers Try to Undercut Instagram Co-Founder’s Damaging Testimony
Apr 23, 2025 by
CPI
Tyson Foods, Others Settle Pork Price-Fixing Suit for $64 Million
Apr 23, 2025 by
CPI
NJ Sues RealPage, Landlords Over Rent Collusion
Apr 23, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Probes Disney’s FuboTV Acquisition Over Antitrust Concerns
Apr 23, 2025 by
CPI
Former LG New Zealand Executives Plead Guilty Over Deleted Messages
Apr 23, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece